Sumathi Sataka - Its relevance to modern living(6)
“Aakonna
kuude amrutham
Taakoncheka
nichhuvade daata dharitrin
sokorchuvade
manujudu
tekuva
kalavade vamsatilakudu mahilo Sumathi”
In
English it is something like this
Whatever Food available to a very hungry person
One
who does not stop at giving is the best philanthropist
One
who comfort others without caring for his own is the best human being
One
who has the efficiency / wherewithal to improve family name is the
head of the family
in
the world
The above are the best things to happen in the world. When one is
hungry whatever food available tastes the best. The person in such a
situation will not be considered about the origin, taste, colour etc.
The person will consume the food and will find it the most tasty,
desirable food at that time. He will even remember such moments and
such food all through his life. In India and remembers the giver as a
God, Amritha is considered the food of the Gods.
A person can be considered the best Philanthropist if he does not go
back on his word or does not go back even in the face of a peril to
self. There is a great story in Indian mythology about an emperor
called Sibi. When there was a discussion between the Gods, his name
came up as the top philanthropist of all the worlds. To check this,
Indra, king of gods turns into an Eagle and chases another god who
turns to a dove. When the dove approaches Sibi for protection, he
grants the same immediately. Then the eagle confronts Sibi and tell
him that it is following the rules of the nature by hunting other
birds for its food and that Sibi has stopped it from earning its food
in the natural way. The eagle then suggests to Sibi to provide flesh
from his body equal to the weight of the dove in order not to deprive
of its food. Sibi agrees for the same put the dove on one side of the
weighing scales and start cutting his limbs one by one and putting
them on the other side. However the dove turns out to be more heavier
than those limbs. Ultimately Sibi himself sits on the other side of
the scales. The moral of the story is that a person when decides to
help should not hold back. This is because half-hearted help is no help at all.
The third line talks about a person who can be considered humane.
When one is in troubles a person who provides comfort either by word
or deed is considered humane and he fits the definition of a real
human being.
Lastly a person cannot be considered as the head of the family just
by birth. One may be the eldest by birth but if is not virtuous
enough or efficient enough to hold up the family name or fortunes
then he / she cannot be considered as head of the family. It should
be the one who has the desirable qualities to hold up the family name
to be considered as head of family.
Comments
Post a Comment