What is happening in Andhra Pradesh…………..? --- Capital conundrum



With the reorganisation of the state into Andhra Pradesh (balance) and Telangana, Hyderabad which was the capital now became capital of Telangana. Political leaders from Andhra tried their best to keep Hyderabad as joint capital (which is absurd considering it being surrounded by areas from Telangana) or at best as a Union Territory (a la Chandigarh). However all these were thwarted by the Union Government. During the discussion in Parliament the then UPA government promised help in construction of a capital for the state of Andhra Pradesh. This was also reiterated by Mr Modi (then PM candidate and now Prime Minister) while his election campaign in Andhra. The then Union Government constituted a committee under Mr Siva Ramakrishnan to visit all the towns in Andhra and suggest a suitable place for capital city. The present chief minister during his campaign for state legislative elections sold a dream of constructing a capital like Singapore for the state. In fact he promised that he will develop all the district capitals of the 13 districts in Andhra Pradesh like mini-Singapore.

Immediately after getting elected and forming the government the politics of the Capital have started. Ministers in Mr Naidu’s cabinet gave press interviews almost every day stating that capital could be between Vijayawada and Guntur even before the committee constituted by the Union Government submit their report. Mr Naidu himself constituted two committees with the directive to look into the possibility of development of area around Vijayawada – Guntur as capital. The committee visited Singapore, Malaysian Capital (Kuala Lumpur), Naya Raipur (Chhattisgarh capital) etc., to suggest a model. This is a clear attempt of subverting the opinion of the people and the Siva Ramakrishnan committee. There used to be news every day that  Singapore government has agreed to collaborate and help construction of the new capital and the blueprint is being prepared there etc. When media reports came out stating that Siva Ramakrishnan committee has suggested a different place for capital, there were criticisms by the ruling Telugu Desam party that a senior IAS officer with the committee has purchased lands around that area which is why that particular area has been suggested. This is an unfortunate development in Andhra politics in the recent times that anybody suggesting a particular activity will be immediately accused as interested party. There are lot of things to be taken into consideration for building a capital like availability of land for future development, availability of basic requirements like water, transporation facilities etc. Though the area around Vijayawada scores on basic requirements like water, transportation etc., it fails in the aspect of land availability for future development. Most of the lands around Vijayawada and Guntur are private lands whose rates have gone up manifold already in the recent past. There is little land available for future development.

Anyway when the government wanted to officially make an announcement in the state legislature, the main opposition party objected to the same stating there was no proper debate. For this the ruling party members commented that the opposition leader does not know the conventions properly and talking rubbish. He was accused of inciting regional differences. But the common sense point is once a cabinet decision is announced in the Assembly what will be the use of any actions of the opposition in Assembly? The government always has the privilege either to accept the suggestion of opposition or disregard the same. Ultimately the Chief Minister intimated the Assembly that the cabinet has taken decision to construct the capital in the area surrounding Vijayawada only disregarding whatever suggestions given by the Committee or debating / discussing the locations with other parties in the State. Hope this decision does not end up as a short sighted one in the long run.

Now the latest news is that Mr Naidu is considering constructing the capital in line with Chicago city in USA. So exit Singapore and enter Chicago for now. There is no guarantee that models of cities like Sao Paolo or even Washington does not come into picture in future. What will be shape and style of capital of Andhra Pradesh will be a million dollar (Singapore $? Or US $?) question.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Anna Hazare’s Janlokpal Bill – Are we looking at Orwellian type of society?

India is in frenzy for the last 10 days with the anti-corruption rhetoric of Mr Anna Hazare. This is similar to the one witnessed sometime back over the issue of bringing back the black money from Swiss banks. The black money issue was first coined by Bharatiya Janata Party and later taken up by Mr Anna Hazare and Mr Ramdev Baba apart from sundry others. What we are witnessing now is not dissimilar to the earlier issue. Anti-corruption rhetoric is not new either in India or abroad. It was Mr Jawaharlal Nehru, the first prime minister of India who declared that a corrupt person should be hanged from the nearest lamp post around 100 years ago. We are yet to see a single hanging. It was taken up by the successive prime ministers but nothing has happened. In fact, all the governments starting from the first government post-independence have seen some scandal or other. The lamentable fact is nothing has happened in any of these cases be it the Jeeps scandal (of the first government) of th...
Read more

Sumathi Satakam - Lessons for Modern Management

“Erakumi Kasugayala Durakumi bandhujanula doshamu summi Parakumi ranamuna Meerakumi guruvunagna medina Sumathi”   The English translation is something like this Do not collect unripe fruits Do not point out errors of relatives Do not run away from battle Do not go above the order given by your teacher   This is a simple poem taught to the young students in Andhra giving them four important principles in life.   The first line asks the students not to collect unripe fruits when collecting the fruits for immediate consumption. Many types of unripe fruits taste different from the ripe one. For example a ripe mango tastes totally different from a raw mango. By collecting the unripe fruits one will be wasting the resources as they may not be useful and may be thrown away.   The second line talks about not pointing out the errors of relatives as this will alienate them. By alienating the relatives we may not be able to expec...
Read more

Let Us Celebrate Justice for Celebrities - II

Image
Within days from the suspension of sentence of Mr Salman Khan, we witnessing one more controversial thing - Acquittal of J Jayalalitha, former Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu. This happened on appeal in a case where she was sentenced after 18 years of hearings in various courts (some of them were regular in Tamil Nadu itself and some special courts either constituted by Tamil Nadu Government or Supreme Court). The case is about assets disproportionate to the income of Jayalalitha and her associates (Sashikala, her son and some companies) by an amount of around Rs 66 Crores. In current days of where people talk about hundreds of Crores of rupees as loose change, the amount stated looks like a pittance. But remember around 18-20 years back this is a substantial amount. Even the much celebrated Bofors case involves a total amount of Rs 130 - 160 Crores only. A display of personal adoration which characterizes Tamil politics. In this picture people are pouring milk on the wall painting...
Read more